Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Sensory Substitution and Augmentation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Fiona Macpherson

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780197266441

Published to British Academy Scholarship Online: September 2019

DOI: 10.5871/bacad/9780197266441.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM BRITISH ACADEMY SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.britishacademy.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright British Academy, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in BASO for personal use.date: 18 November 2019

Limits of the Classical Functionalist Perspective on Sensory Substitution

Limits of the Classical Functionalist Perspective on Sensory Substitution

Chapter:
(p.130) 8 Limits of the Classical Functionalist Perspective on Sensory Substitution
Source:
Sensory Substitution and Augmentation
Author(s):

Maurice Ptito

Katrine Iversen

Malika Auvray

Ophelia Deroy

Ron Kupers

, Fiona Macpherson
Publisher:
British Academy
DOI:10.5871/bacad/9780197266441.003.0008

The tongue display unit (TDU) is a sensory substitution device that translates visual images into electrotactile stimulation that is transmitted to the tongue and leads to new perceptual skills following training. Trained users, including blind individuals, become capable of orientation discrimination, motion detection, shape recognition and they can also successfully use the TDU to navigate in an environment, locate objects and avoid obstacles. Many studies and discussions have focused on the effects of training at the behavioural level, and assumed that the effects shown in training blindfolded sighted individuals are similar to those observed in blind people. In doing so, we argue that behavioural research on sensory substitution shows a functionalist bias. Functionalism claims that mental processes can be individuated by their characteristic inputs and outputs, and that the physical realization of a given function introduces no relevant difference, as long as the function is the same. We emphasize here why this assumption biases the interpretation of sensory substitution devices.

Keywords:   sensory substitution, blind, functionalism, tongue display unit, electrotactile stimulation

British Academy Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.